On 15/04/2009 18:25, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Robert Fraser
<[email protected]> wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Are there few non-arithmetic operators (that will support operator
overloading too) with a clear semantics that can be added to D?
a ♥ b
opLove.
sounds silly to me. Why not simply generalize and allow defining in-fix
functions like in functional languages? that also includes allowing any
unicode character[s].
for example, why not allow:
if (M ⊨ a ∨ b) { ... }
or:
(a concat b concat c) [same as (a ~ b ~ c)]
or:
if (A dated B || B dated A) { .. }
the current system is too limiting, maybe that's why it's more
susceptible to being abused?
if C++ had this, I'm sure that the awful << for streams wouldn't have
been used.
