On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:58:32 -0400, davidl <[email protected]> wrote:
I believe the following allow the runtime reflection wrapper. Though it
changes the old semantics, the old one can be implemented on top of the
new semantics
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2868
That's cool.
However, you have misunderstood how the opDot function name should be
passed via templates.
The opDot signature should not take a type as the first argument, but a
string. Otherwise, you have no compile-time abilities with the function
name:
opDot(string methodname, T...)(T args)
instead of
opDot(U:immutable(char)[], T...)(U methodname, T args)
-Steve
