On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:54:21PM +0100, deadalnix wrote: > Le 06/11/2012 15:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling a écrit : [...] > >I have some potential use-cases where some of the not-in-Phobos stuff > >(e.g. sets) might be a good solution. It'd clearly be much nicer to > >be able to rely purely on the standard library instead of something > >outside. So, if there are some trivial things that can be done to get > >code transferred (e.g. if it's just a matter of time that people > >don't have), it'd be nice to know, in case I can do something to > >assist. > > > > You are not alone. You have my full psychological support.
Ditto. If it can be done in Phobos, it should be in Phobos. T -- "You are a very disagreeable person." "NO."
