Le 06/11/2012 20:47, Manu a écrit :
I actually quite liked Tristan's argument.
[attr, attr2] feels more like what it is, an annotation. It does
nothing, has no effect on the declaration on its own.
the @attr syntax looks like existing attributes, and with that kinda
comes the presumption that they actually DO something, affect the code
generated in some way.
This is definitively what they should do at some point.
For that reason, I buy the argument that [attrs...] being visually
distinct makes more sense, more like what it is.
Perhaps it should be termed 'annotation' rather than 'attribute'?
On 6 November 2012 21:38, ponce <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I like @(ArgumentList) better for stated reason: it looks like
existing @attributes.
