Le 06/11/2012 22:53, Walter Bright a écrit :
On 11/6/2012 1:41 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 06/11/2012 22:02, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:18:34 Walter Bright wrote:
No hitting below the belt! Let the games begin!
Definitely @(ArgumentList). It fits with what other languages do, and
it matches
what we're already doing for attributes. I also think that's what
pretty much
everyone was figuring would be used for user-defined attributes. The
only major
problem would be if @ArgumentList is allowed when there's only a single
argument, then code could break when new built-in attributes are added.
Can you explain that code breakage ?
C++11 has had problems adding new keywords, as about every identifier
somewhere has been used by someone's C++ source code, and they don't
want to break existing code. So C++11 winds up with awful things like
"decltype".
OK I understand. This is fixable easily by adding thoses magic attribute
in object and using regular lookup rules.
