On 11 November 2012 19:03, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 11:17 +0000, Iain Buclaw wrote: > […] >> I'd say feature. If libgphobos was a shared object, I don't believe >> you would get this. > > So the upshot is that we need to indent for libgphobos2.so in order for > D to be useful in association with Python and ctypes. > > I guess the question is whether, like Go, D will eschew shared objects, > or whether, like C and C++, D will embrace shared objects. >
I'm genuinely optimistic about embracing shared objects. Though I've taken a cathedral stance and will not be releasing anything until it is ready. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
