On 11/12/12, monarch_dodra <[email protected]> wrote: > I've noticed though it has no built-in "hashed container" for > when you just need to store unique elements, but without any > specific data associated (lists of names, for example).
You probably mean a Set? I think we could really use some syntax support for sets. Otherwise people use workarounds like "alias void[0][string] StringSet", and wrap such a type in a struct with operator overloads to emulate the built-in hash syntax.
