On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 14:53:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/12/12, monarch_dodra <[email protected]> wrote:
I've noticed though it has no built-in "hashed container" for
when you just need to store unique elements, but without any
specific data associated (lists of names, for example).
You probably mean a Set? I think we could really use some syntax
support for sets. Otherwise people use workarounds like "alias
void[0][string] StringSet", and wrap such a type in a struct
with
operator overloads to emulate the built-in hash syntax.
Well "set" is just a name by convention. In C++, set's complexity
restrictions forces the binary tree implementation on it.
