On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 19:12:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 19:06:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Given the fact that this subject is extremely devisive, I
suspect that the
best that we can hope for at this point is for lax property
enforcement
@property shouldn't be about enforcement. This is the
fundamental flaw in the -property switch. While I think you and
I are talking about the same goal, this is an important
distinction to make: the fix isn't syntax. It is a semantic
rewrite.
After referencing a property is rewritten to be a call, the
syntax will just work:
@property int foo() {}
int a = foo(); // the error here is NOT "you must not use () on
properties". It is "type int is not callable"
Yes
This is something that's bothered me about the @property debate
since day one: we spend all this time talking about syntax....
but that's a side effect, not the core question.
+1
