It'll always be true for anything that IS immutable. If (theoretically) we had mutable compile-time variables, the ones marked as immutable would behave exactly like the current compile-time values. Otherwise, yes, we'd have to give up the freedom of evaluation for the mutable ones.
But Jonathan is right, that's not going to happen. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:36 PM, jerro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 November 2012 at 11:28:21 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: > >> Basically the most important thing I miss is mutable compile-time >> variables. That's it. Everything else can be worked around. >> > > I like the fact that you don't need to worry about the order in which > things are compiled. > -- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.
