11/27/2012 3:47 PM, monarch_dodra пишет:
On Tuesday, 27 November 2012 at 09:15:02 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I benched using varied sources of data, in particular, both ASCII only
strings, as well as unicode heavy text.
Nothing better then a dump of Arabic wiki ? ;)
I benched with a dump of the japanese wiki actually ^^
Also I recall German has surprisingly interesting mix of unicode & ascii.
Unicode has better gains, but raw ASCII text is *also* has gains :/
this holds true for both UTF-8 and UTF-16.
UTF-32 is different, because foreach has the "unfair" advantage of not
validating the code points...
I got these results on 2.061 alpha release, with phobos in release and
both -inline and without inline.
Don't forget the -O -noboundscheck. As some things are safe and thus
always have bounds check.
I though "noboundscheck" only had an effect on code marked "@system"...?
That would the -release switch. It has the effect of removing asserts
and bounds checks from @system code. -noboundscheck will kill all of
them everywhere I believe.
The dedicated to -release switch TDPL table goes as following:
Safe System
Non-release: + +
Release: + -
Except that '-' in a the book is marked as a skull-and-crossbones :)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
