On Sunday, December 02, 2012 12:36:53 Artur Skawina wrote: > [1] If you think the required '()' in UFCS chains look ugly, you're right, > but the right fix isn't to butcher the language.
I agree, but those who think that seem to be outnumbered by those who don't want to have to use the parens - particularly with functions which already require a template argument. - Jonathan M Davis
