On 11/30/2012 09:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/30/12 4:49 AM, 1100110 wrote:
Andrei's support is also necessary, IIRC he is one of main person behind
phobos. A stable version of D is not useful without a stable version of
phobos and druntime to go with it.
I'm very supportive of a serious, meaningful initiative.
My perception is that we're having growing pains - our process is
lagging behind the participation in the project and the attention it
receives. If Walter and I do not acknowledge that in time and act
swiftly on it, we're heading toward a crisis in the community much, much
larger and dangerous than the D1/D2 schism.
Andrei
Andrei, How would you organize this?
If the process is lagging behind, what can be done to get it up-to-speed?
