Re: @property needed or not needed?

[Michael]

void f()
{
    writeln("hi");
}

f; // this currently works

I don't know if this is possible to implement.

I expect it is, perhaps by disallowing calling a property 
function with no arguments.

It's regular function called as property [getter] of module.
It's nice to have @property like in C#, and permit calling 
without () only to @property.

function without () - property - for simple tasks.
function/procedure/action with () - for resource-intensive tasks.