On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:41:29 H. S. Teoh wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:16:32PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Monday, December 10, 2012 08:11:52 deadalnix wrote: > > > 3/ Now that UDA are in master, what to do with them ? They > > > clearly are not ready for release. > > > > Move them to a branch and remove them from master. > > [...] > > Wouldn't this be the right time to put the D stable idea to work? Leave > UDA in master, but create a 2.061 release branch without UDA, and > release that.
D stable is being run by someone else. It seems like the current plan is for us to continue to put out releases like we have been but the D stable folks will manage a separate repo which only has the stable changes and then fully syncs up with master at some interval. Whether that's the best way to deal with it is another matter, but that at least looks like what they're planning on doing. Regardless, the UDA stuff can't be in the next release. If we want to create a branch that we do the release from (which we should be doing anyway), then UDA can be explicitly removed from there rather than master, but it needs to not be released regardless. How D stable gets managed is a related matter, but based on the discussions on that, I expect that that will be sorted out _after_ the next release rather than with the next release (particularly since this is the last release with D1, and Walter is more open to changing how does things after he doesn't have to support D1 anymore). - Jonathan M Davis
