On 12/10/2012 04:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:54:52 +0100
"Peter Alexander"<peter.alexander...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 03:18:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/09/2012 08:10 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
The whole process only takes 5-7 seconds here.
"Only" is not the right word to use here.
Yea, there's nothing about that page that has any reason whatsoever
to take 5-7 seconds on even 10-year-old hardware, let alone on anything
more common. I had a 500*MHz* in the late 90's that could render a
nice-looking HTML page the same size faster than that. There's no
justification here.
I've had dail-up, I've had satelite internet.
"Only" is indeed the appropriate word to use.