11.12.2012 3:01, Walter Bright пишет:
On 12/10/2012 8:28 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
This was the result of DustMite-ing my sources:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296
Currently the bug state is a bit confusing. It is a regression (but I
didn't
mark it that way, only write in description, sorry) but is resolved as a
duplicate of a non-regression unfixed bug 4269. It was a small war
between
"regression" and "normal" state of 4269 and now it is marked as "normal".
It isn't a regression, and the test cases you reported work in D1 and D2.
I had a code base that worked. With new compiler it stopped working. I
DustMite-ed code base and posted this issue. It's really surprising that
it wasn't a regression...
I know that tests from the issue pass now. I just didn't think I have to
DustMite again to provide new ones as the issue is marked as a duplicate
of an unfixed one.
--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij
