On 12/22/2012 12:46 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Pretty much every time that this issue comes up, people are surprised by the fact that private symbols aren't hidden and pretty much no one wants them to be in overload sets.
This has been discussed before, and the same people wanted private functions removed from overload sets in classes.
So why does this never come up in C++ if it's such a problem? Like I said, I've never seen this come up on peoples' lists of what they don't like about C++, and it isn't because they're shy about complaining about C++ :-)
