> That's not how you define implicit conversions in D. It's a weird hack > from C++. > > Thanks for clarification. I knew about alias this, but I thought it was in addition to constructor path.
Regards - Puneet
> That's not how you define implicit conversions in D. It's a weird hack > from C++. > > Thanks for clarification. I knew about alias this, but I thought it was in addition to constructor path.
Regards - Puneet