On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 01:20:36AM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 1/5/13 1:04 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:53:13PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >>Now that the issue of documentation came up, I wonder if there's > >>interest in a high-quality PDF rendering of the language spec (e.g. > >>similar to the interior design of TDPL itself). Is it worth the > >>effort? > >[...] > > > >Is it ready for finalization, or are major changes (like UDA) still > >going to take place? If major changes are still going to take place > >(and, in the long run, I hope D will keep improving), then we should > >have a version system for the spec, so that we don't end up in the > >situation where somebody with a copy of the older spec thinks feature > >X is one way, and the latest implementation according to a newer spec > >implements it a different way, but there's no indication of which > >spec is supposed to be the correct one. > > The spec pdf would be just a rendering of the online dox, just like > .mobi is. [...]
OK. Well, to answer your original question, yes I'm interested in a PDF rendering. I do think we should attach a version to it, though. Or at least a last-revised date. T -- Gone Chopin. Bach in a minuet.
