On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Walter Bright <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 1/5/2013 1:38 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote: > >> It is a strange sublanguage. It has its problems, but compared to >> what D >> documentation was like before Ddoc, it is a HUGE and incalculable >> leap forward. >> >> >> I was just wondering if there was a way to make it a bit more D-ish. The >> $(NAME >> arg, arg) syntax feels like I'm entering another land when I have to use >> it. >> > > You are entering another land with it. Text processing is totally > different, and it should be different. > I'm not convinced, but that's not really important. > > They aren't really much different from the website macros. In fact, the D > ebook is created out of the same source files the website is. The macros to > do it are all in github. Also, Phobos/index.d is sadly in HTML, not in Ddoc. >> > > All those source files are on github. > I must be tired, because the only .ddoc file I find is std.ddoc. No .d article on templates, etc: only the .html files.
