On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 10:31:51 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 10:19:24 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
Yes I did, but I didn't realize you were talking about a
background GC, sorry.
Yeah, if you can have a background GC that can keep up with
your needs, then the world is great. Trouble is, I don't see
how that can be true for a intensive applications like games.
You are changing the subject discussed every 2 posts. I'm
loosing my time here, that will be my last answer to you.
That wasn't my intention, but the subject suddenly changed to
background GCs which I didn't expect to be talking about
either... but if you don't have the time to continue then I'll
avoid responding too.
