On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 22:28:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:18:07PM +0100, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 22:02:17 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
>+ user defined implicit conversion so that AALiteral(K,V)
>--*implicitly*!--> AA!(K,V)
>
>
>The other use case for user-defined implicit conversion were
>already outlined before so I hope it will make its way in one
>day.
I thought I heard talk of possibly moving AA's to a library
implementation rather than a built in feature (Still 'built in'
technically).
That's my plan, and Andrei's hope. But it's not going to be
easy. The
current AA implementation is split between object_.d and aaA.d
in
druntime, with bits scattered throughout the compiler. Cleaning
all of
that up is going to be a big job.
You may want to look at this :
http://preshing.com/20130107/this-hash-table-is-faster-than-a-judy-array
Additionally, can you show me what you have so far ? I'd be
interested in using it directly for SDC without using the
existing one at all.
