Re: Bidirectional range dilemma

[monarch_dodra]

On Sunday, 13 January 2013 at 16:54:24 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:

On Sunday, 13 January 2013 at 16:31:30 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:

Personally,

I would have the policy implemented:
permutations( Policy p = Policy.forward )() {
...
}

And maybe extend it with aliases:

alias fPermutations permutations!( Policy.forward );
alias rPermutations permutations!( Policy.backward );
alias biPermutations permutations!( Policy.bidirectional );

Cheers!

And of course I managed to invert alias terms again!

Just use the new syntax.

alias fPermutations  = permutations!( Policy.forward );
alias rPermutations  = permutations!( Policy.backward );
alias biPermutations = permutations!( Policy.bidirectional );