On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 11:18 -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote: […] > What would *really* be nice is if we extended the current format > specifiers to be able to deal with named parameters and custom > modifiers, for example: […]
Isn't there a way of handling this with closure capture. Python, Groovy, etc. handle all this with dynamic lookup. Scala, etc. handle it with value capture. (I haven't worked this through properly, it is just a quick reaction to reading the code. I may therefore have missed the point.) -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
