I think there is no problem. Kenji Hara
2013/1/21 Walter Bright <[email protected]> > The current version is pretty verbose. For: > > int ***x; > > it will emit as the type: > > "type" : { > "kind" : "pointer", > "pretty" : "int***", > "targetType" : { > "kind" : "pointer", > "pretty" : "int**", > "targetType" : { > "kind" : "pointer", > "pretty" : "int*", > "targetType" : { > "kind" : "int", > "pretty" : "int" > } > } > } > } > > I find this to be excessive, and it helps to produce truly gigantic .json > files. I think it's better to just put out the deco for the type: > > "type" : "PPPi" > > But, you might say, that is not user friendly! Nope, it isn't. But the > .json output is for a machine to read, not humans, and the deco types are > very space efficient, and are trivial to convert to whatever data structure > the reader needs. Much easier than the verbose thing. > > What do you think? >
