On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 14:29:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 14:06:49 UTC, eles wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 13:37:21 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 12:49:47 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 22:29:45 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/18/2013 2:16 PM, Andrey wrote:
What would be the point ? You'll have the implementation and
the function definition under the nose anyway as it is in the
same file.
If something should be private from your code, what is your
code doing is the same module ?
1. Quoting Andrey's original post (3rd on this thread):
I don't really understand the logic here. That seems very
confused to me.
Just think about Andrey as being such C++ programmer that gave D
a try and ran away. Why? Because it was puzzled to see that,
despit being "private", the attribute is "public" (well, to some
degree).
His first thought was that D should not be used into production
environment.
OK? Andrey is one C++ programmer that you lose, you cannot
convert him to D. Does D afford that?
