Am 20.01.2013 12:25, schrieb Robert: > Of course. Just at the moment issue: > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8441 > > is holding it back.
Bugs, as usual. > It will be probably named std.signals2 or something to maintain > backwards compatibility, but yeah I definitely want to get it into > phobos. In fact, I don't even have a use for it in my own projects, I > just saw the current implementation and thought there must be a better > way. So the whole point of implementing it, was to get it into phobos. Good news. > I strongly encourage you to use my implementation, because real world > testing before becoming a part of the standard library is always a good > idea. But keep in mind, that it wasn't formally reviewed yet so your > code might break, when being included into phobos. (Stuff might get > renamed for example.) On the other hand fixing this issues should not be > too much work. So yeah, please try it out, so it will be perfect when > included. The feature set and set of improvements, should be convincing > anyway, if not I have done something wrong. I can't do that, I am using std.signals in a library and I wanna keep it as small as possible.
