On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:49:30 -0800 "H. S. Teoh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:27:48PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:54:59 +0100 > > "deadalnix" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > We move from ruby on rail to Node.js for scalability reasons > > > !!!!!! > > > > I take it this "scalability reason" is to avoid scalability? > > > > You should to read Ted Dziuba's "Node.js is Cancer", he explains it > > better than I can: (He's destroyed all his good older posts, but I > > managed to save this one from a cache:) > > https://semitwist.com/mirror/node-js-is-cancer.html > > Anything that involves running javascript on a *server* cannot > possibly be a good idea. (I mean, I have hesitations about running > javascript on the *client*, needless to say a server...) > Exactly. Although, I'd be willing to entertain the idea that it's better than running PHP on a server. Not that that's saying much. Case in point: https://semitwist.com/articles/
