This article cinched it for me:

http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/dynamic-languages-are-static-languages/

(Summary for the tl;dr people: dynamic languages == static languages
straitjacketed with only a single type.)

This article and the tl;dr is so founded in complete misunderstanding of dynamic typing and object-oriented programming, that it cannot be taken seriously. Dynamically typed languages do have problems, but this level
of hate is so profoundly wrong there should be laws against it.


What? As much as I dislike arguments by authority: Do you even know who Robert Harper is? Claiming that he misunderstands OO or dynamic typing is absurd.

Reply via email to