On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:57:39PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 1/21/13 10:32 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:55 -0500 > >Andrei Alexandrescu<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>On 1/21/13 3:06 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >>>I have to admit that ddoc hasn't really done it for me (yet). I > >>>think the impediment is that the default output needs some work > >>>(mainly in CSS and indexing) before it is useful as actual > >>>documentation. > >> > >>We should make a few macro batteries (HTML, mobi, pdf) readily > >>available in e.g. tools/ or examples/. > >> > > > >Is that possible? PDF is binary, but I thought DDoc only did text > >output? Come to think of it, how *do* the non-html versions of the > >docs currently get generated? > > LaTeX. [...]
Speaking of which, did you manage to polish up the LaTeX macros to produce decent output? I'd love to take a look if you did -- I'm a LaTeX fan. T -- Those who've learned LaTeX swear by it. Those who are learning LaTeX swear at it. -- Pete Bleackley
