Re: @property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[monarch_dodra]

On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 10:22:00 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
f = g; where it means f(g) is really ugly. I wouldn't like to 
see this.

Also:

void printSomeStuff()
{
  //...
}

We are going to see code like this:
printSomeStuff; // i think that's ugly.

I suggested make parentheses optional only for UFC syntax.
Also isn't it possible to allow @property for functions that 
belong in a class/struct only?

@property also makes sense for global functions that need to 
emulate a run-time initialized static variable.