On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 22:39:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, January 25, 2013 23:23:50 mist wrote:
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 22:15:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> They both already work and have do so for ages.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
Erm? Yes, and thus it was an answer to "you need to mess every
function declaration with an annotation"
I know. I was responding to Rob's post which implied that the
syntax you gave
didn't currently work.
- Jonathan M Davis
I misread the post by mist, I incorrectly thought that it was a
new syntax proposal as I did not know about @property:.
--rt