On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 22:23:05 UTC, mist wrote:
There was discussion recently about unpleasant name conflict
possible with private module symbols. I have just encountered a
sarcastically false statement on dlang.org : "Private module
members are equivalent to static declarations in C programs."
Made me sad and wondering: was there any DIP after that thread
or it has ended, as it often happens, with a decision to "plan
carefully"? In latter case I may try to write one.
Can you explain what is broken ?
