On 01/28/2013 12:34 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/27/2013 06:33 PM, Dicebot wrote:
...
"unambiguous" == "I can understand semantics of code I have just read
with as little additional context as possible"
...

In order to do that, it is necessary

to be

aware of the precise definitions,
or at least specifications, of referenced declarations in any case. So
by your definition, the current function call syntax is "unambiguous".

Reply via email to