On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 02:10:48 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
OK, let me restate that, as it was probably too strong.
We got to be pedantic on the vocabulary used. We are trying to
define very precise stuffs. We cannot define anything with
imprecise vocabulary.
Sorry for the intellectual dishonesty part, that was too much.
Well, why not leave formal vocabulary to DIPs and use wiki to
brainstorm a bit? In any case, I really wonder how callable
structs/classes fit the big picture. Intuitively I would like to
behave them as functions in the similar way properties behave
like data. But is that really feasible?
