On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 12:04:42 UTC, Szymon wrote:
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 21:30:22 UTC, mist wrote:
On Saturday, 26 January 2013 at 20:54:30 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2013-01-26 20:55, SomeDude wrote:
AFAWK, at least one major videogames studio is writing its
new title in D.
For real? You must be joking. :)
Tsss, it is a secret ;)
We actually are video game company ;) That is why D seems like
perfect choice for future language. Native code + superb
programmer productivity + fast compile times. If D was bit more
mature decision would be dead simple.
I believe that if you stick with a particular version of the
compiler + druntime + phobos then you could use D now.
If you treat it as a nicer c++ and don't branch out in to the
more exotic features, I'd expect a pretty smooth ride.
