On 1/28/13 11:21 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 15:44:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Phobos is kind of fucked up in this regard.
I understand how you feel though you probably are overstating it. No
language can please everyone, and nobody will be pleased by all
aspects of a language.
Yes that is probably overstated. But please consider that this state of
thing in phobos comes from the lax property enforcement in the first
place, which mitigate greatly your argument about phobos codebase.
I don't see how that computes. We started from lax rules. Then we had
somewhat stronger rules, and I personally saw no benefit. I fail to see
how it follows that even stronger rules would help there.
Andrei
