Hello Andrei,
BCS wrote:
Hello Andrei,
BCS wrote:
Hello Andrei,
dsimcha wrote:
Absolutely not. It's far too useful as syntactic sugar when
working heavily with plain old data structs, and saves a lot of
tedious repetition of the struct instance name.
Make it a member function! If you don't have access to the struct,
use "s." as the prefix! I can't believe that's stopping you from
getting work done!
I don't follow.
"s." is hardly any typing.
wrong bit, I should have cut more:
Make it a member function!
?
In a member function there's no need to prefix each member.
Andrei
how does that heplp you when you either don't have access to the type or
don't want to add the code using the type to it
module somelib;
struct S
{
int x, y, z;
}
module someapp;
import somelib;
void fn(char[] str, S s)
{
with(s)
{
sscanf(str.ptr, "<%i, %i, %i>", &x, &z, &y); // I'm not adding this
to S
}
}
