On Sun, 17 May 2009 19:33:35 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I think "with" is a very dangerous feature due to the way it hides
> symbols. It essentially makes the feeblest attempt at modular reasoning
> utterly impossible:
>
> int x, y;
> with (whatever)
> {
> y += x;
> ++x;
> }
I guess the reason for using with() is to avoid typing repetitive stuff.
Would this work instead ...
int x, y;
with (p as "somevery.long.struct.or.class[17].name")
{
y += p.x;
++p.x;
}
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
