Hello Nick,
"Georg Wrede" <georg.wr...@iki.fi> wrote in message
news:guqdmn$1tk...@digitalmars.com...
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I therefore submit that "with" is an extremely dangerous feature and
should be removed from the language. What say you?
Non-touch typers will riot.
I'm not a touch-typer, but I've never seen much of a point to "with".
If I have to access a bunch of members of
"foo.member.x.bar[17].fizzle", I'll just do
"auto fizz = foo.member.x.bar[17].fizzle;" and use that, or put it into
that dosn't work if it's by value and is used as an Lvalue.
a function that takes a "typeof(fizze)", or do something else along
like this? that looks... odd.
void outer()
{
void inner(ref T t)
{
t.somthing;
...
}
inner(foo.member.x.bar[17].fizzle);
}
those lines. I've yet to come across a case where something like
that isn't perfectly sufficient.
