Re: Possible @property compromise

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 05:07:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 05:57:14 Jesse Phillips wrote:
It seems at least some members for @property feel that 
currently
functions are being annotated with @property that shouldn't be.

The prime example of that would be save.

- Jonathan M Davis

rehash, dup, length (as a setter), the list goes on and on.