On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 18:35:29 Namespace wrote: > On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 17:26:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:51:22 Paulo Pinto wrote: > >> I prefer the Pascal family way where they are implicit, but > >> lets > >> have what the majority prefers. > > > > We've had this discussion at length before. It should stay > > implicit. > > Ehh, where is this discussion
I don't remember when it was discussed before. It's happened at least a couple of times, and I'd have to go digging through the archives. But after those discussions, I believe that it was pretty clear that we're not going to start supporting ref at the call site. > and will this change implemented in the near future? What change? My point was that it's _not_ changing. Function parameters can be marked with ref, but the call site doesn't use ref, and it isn't going to start using ref. - Jonathan M Davis
