interesting implementation, and very fast indeed...
(My Netbook MSI Wind u100 - Intel Atom)
S() (DMD) -> 0.189 s
C gcc -03 -> 0.445 s
SArray (DMD) -> 0.738 s
C gcc -02 -> 3.205 s
Gr,
Danny Arends
http://www.dannyarends.nl
On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 09:28:05 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
actually, we can use
"T0[T.length]ret=void;"
instead of
"T0[T.length]ret;"
inside the definition of S. It doesn't make a difference for
ldc which optimizes it away, but it does for dmd (which is also
about 10x slower than ldc).
