On Monday, 4 February 2013 at 04:45:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, February 03, 2013 03:16:08 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Destroy.
Another thing to consider would be to allow putting @property
on a variable
with the idea that variables marked as such would not be usable
in any
situation where a property function wouldn't be - such as
taking their address
or passing them by ref. [..]
If we consider a variable marked as @property as a variable whose
access is restricted, then the following should be also illegal
uses of it:
1) calling its non-const method
2) mutating its data field
If we consider a variable marked as @property as lowered to
getter and setter properties, then it doesn't have those
restrictions. This is what I would advocate.
