On Monday, 4 February 2013 at 22:46:36 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 19:59:12 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Well, we can disagree, but you still haven't explained why
it's fundamental. Other languages have implemented properties
just fine without having to specify that they are structs or
aggregate types. Until you come up with a compelling reason
for structs, I'll stand by my position.
Do you mind if I put my arguments in a new thread?
FYI, I got some feedback from Andrei today in the DIP23 thread ...
--------------------
On 2/4/13 1:15 PM, Rob T wrote:
BTW, I am wondering if the idea of "memberspaces" was
considered, and if
it was considered, then why was it dropped?
An idea that departs considerably from the current status in D
has a
disadvantage compared to an idea that makes things work within the
@property framework.
Andrei
--------------------
See
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
--rt
