On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 11:28:25 monarch_dodra wrote: > I don't know if this is related or not (I'd think it is), but if > we were to re-think phobos' module organization, we may also want > to think about how we want to deal with changing entire modules > at once. > > I'm mostly thinking about things like "random2.d", "xmk2.d" or > whatnot.
I believe that that's what we decided on previously. It just hasn't actually been done yet, because no one has implemented such a module since the decision was made. - Jonathan M Davis
