Am 06.02.2013 08:38, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Probably it'll need a fair amount of tweaking. Anyhow it's in destroyable form.http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25 Thanks, Andrei
What I don't get is, why is it better to have a function "addressOf(value)" that does exactly the same as &value? Expect that it is more text to type? Why is addressOf(value) more explicit then &value?
Kind Regards Benjamin Thaut
