Am 09.02.2013 16:40, schrieb kenji hara:You can use built-in 'tupleof' property, which still bypass accessmodifier.Will they continue to do so, or will this also be fixed? We should at least have some way to do low level work like serialization.Kind Regards Benjamin Thaut
According to my private-related DIP - yes, they will continue, and there have been no objections on this part.
