On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:38:45 -0500, Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't need examples of how to implement these functions. I'm asking what of these could we add to Phobos. I already have all the functionality in place. I'm trying to estimate the cost of moving these to Phobos, if it's worth porting Orbit to only use Phobos.
Well, many of those could be implemented in Orbit, especially the trivial ones.
The way it was worded, I thought you needed those to be in phobos or have an implementation provided before you could start the port. It did sound a little strange ;)
Some of them are not trivial, and I understand those (e.g. std.process and std.xml), but things like !empty I think would not need a special implementation in phobos for you to be able to port.
-Steve
